An example of this is if I donated $100 to an entity that was a tax deductible entity as determined by the IRS, I would pay $35 less on my taxes. The proposed change would result in only receiving the benefit of a $28 reduction on my taxes, a $7 dollar “reallocation” from me, to the government. Which appears to be a smart move (on first look) by the government to raise income. However, this article suggests for every 10% increase in tax deductability, it “raises the amount that a person gives by about 10%.”

A visual representation of the change in tax structure is seen below. The real impact is felt by the charity, who deals with a 20% reduction in income, while the government sees a 6% increase in tax revenue, and the individual sees a 7% increase in discretionary spending. It was probably not the intent to re-allocate dollars from charities to the government , but without considering the relationship between tax deductions and amount donated, this is exactly what capital hill has proposed.